Toto Expertentipp „Jetzt klingelt's richtig“: Mit Fußballwissen zum Toto Dreizehner.
TOTO 13er Ergebnistipp - Spielplan vom / August Nr. Heimverein. Gastverein. Tendenz. 1. Die Ergebnisse werden montags bekannt gegeben. Prinzipiell ist der 13er Ergebnistipp auch ohne Spielplan spielbar. Beispiel: Laut Tipp (s. Bild) wurde folgende. Toto 13er Tipp. 13er-Tipp Normal, 13er-Tipp System · Auswahltipp Normal · Auswahltipp System. Treffen Sie 13 Spielvoraussagen für den Spielplan (Samstag. gioiavzw.be» Toto und Auswahlwette» Der Wochentipp in der er Wette - D,» Hallo Gast [anmelden|registrieren] Tipp aktuell!! von Norbert. Insgesamt werden in jeder Tippkolonne immer 13 Spiele (5 Fixspiele + 8 Wahlspiele) getippt (z.B. für das Spiel Rapid Wien vs. Austria Wien). Tipp 1: Die.
Die Gewinntipps der TOTO 13er Ergebniswette - die Kultwette von LOTTO - finden Sie hier bei LOTTO S-H! TOTO 13er Ergebnistipp - Spielplan vom / August Nr. Heimverein. Gastverein. Tendenz. 1. TOTO 13er Ergebnistipp Spielplan vom / August Nr. Heimverein. Gastverein. Tend. 1.
Toto Expertentipp TOTO 13er ErgebnistippRang: 13 Richtige 2. Passwort vergessen? Einfach das genaue Spielresultat der ersten 5 Toto Spiele richtig tippen z. Allein die Vielzahl an absoluten Weltklasse-Systemen rechtfertigt die Anschaffung. Wir meinen aber, dass vor allem die Vielzahl an mittleren Gewinnen ein Beweis für Beste Spielothek in Buschort finden Qualität unserer Konstruktionen ist. Diese stehen Ihnen ebenfalls als pdf-Format zum Download zur Verfügung. Pokerstars Einzahlung Bonus 4 Richtige 3. Toto: Hohe Gewinne mit dem 13er!
However, in contrast to the above, I do try and make a definitive structure if it's a small topic or a quick idea for a new project or something simple like vacation plans.
BTW, it also works very well for taking notes for a class or self-study. One way to deal with it is to understand why the mess in the first place.
You may find reasons to forgive the mess. If you're looking at a startup that had to try a lot of things perhaps and when the team was junior hitting on the workable idea later, maybe they just did what they had to do.
The forgivance may also give you the incentive to improve it. A good measure is whether the shitty code does something worthwhile and interesting.
Might get you to a point of empathy. That 6 months is also a great opportunity to establish a test suite. It's dangerous to tell management that the code is bad.
It's not dangerous to say that it needs tests, since that's an industry best practice and there are objectively no tests, and that you believe that a certain amount of your time needs to be devoted to paying back some of that testing debt.
Plus, to my mind, there's no better way to start understanding a new codebase than to start with tests, either writing them or reading the existing suite.
To add on to this, you can still improve the code quality while building on it by adding tests as you go, so you can have some solace and also sanity when testing your own code.
Even if I didnt do anything, the code keeps breaking! I came to this also. In first months of work is learning process: practices, workflows and processes.
Then you should introduce changes via retrospectives. The same solution for outsource companies, that joined to old project.
There are no time for such thing as debates which eggs are better. It should be introduce smoothly. Are you working at my company?
It may or may not reflect on the original developer. Maybe they were learning a new framework. Maybe they were rushed.
Maybe it was originally intended as a prototype but ended up in production. I would suggest framing the issue as the code not scaling well to the new requirements.
Then give them a few options with trade-offs. It could be that management is willing to spend the next few years playing but whack-a-mole to avoid an extra couple weeks on the project to put it under test and refactor a bit.
It could be that they intend to rewrite the entire area of the product in 6 months and only want to invest the minimum effort in changes until then.
If there are deficiencies in the code base, focus on those, their effects, and the gains from fixing them. Blaming people is rarely a good idea, for many reasons.
If the original dev worked on the code base for a long time, they're probably already aware of them.
God knows I'm all too aware of the deficiencies in code I wrote years ago, but that's frequently how things look after years of updates and feature creep.
Everyone on our team has code like that, and when new guys come in and point them out, we just sigh and say "yeah it would be great to rewrite that knowing what we know today".
But budgeting time for that is not easy. Edit: Also, like others said, I think you need to adjust your expectations. Working with code like that is life, and you should appreciate the fact that you, with your outside perspective and youthful energy can make a change for the better.
But it's going to involve lots of refactoring and test writing. The "Legacy Code" book referenced in another post is a great overview of this.
I'd say of all programming books I've read, it's one of the ones that are most relevant to my day to day work. This is a great reply, and I want to second a lot of the points brought up.
Adding on, the original developer is almost certainly aware of definciencies in the code. My guess is that they are largely a result of rushed deadline, changing scope, and feature creep than they are the result of bad engineering.
Where is a good place to get started? All in all, as other posters have mentioned, stay positive, and see how you can clean up and improve your little corner of the world.
One last point, I might take this as a small red flag. Its useful, I also strongly recommend it when you're feeling overwhelmed by a large sprawling code base.
There are many possible causes behind a poor codebase, and it's rarely useful and almost never persuasive to go into finger-pointing mode.
The issue for the OP is: from the business's perspective, is the poor code a problem? If it's not, can they live with continuing to work on this code in this job?
And if it is: what's the next step, and what can they contribute to making it happen? I think it's quite rare for the prototype to not end up in production.
This is even true of the Trans-Siberian Railway [which meant people died]. This is good advice, especially on the communication part. It's always tempting to use the word "rewrite" but most of the time you just want some assurance that your code doesn't break things, and a rewrite is usually overkill.
I would suggest you to add in additional time for refactoring into your new feature development. This has 2 benefits - you're not rewriting the whole project, just the parts that are relevant to what you are currently working on, and you're still pushing out features.
I came to my boss and explained a handful of ways that I could potentially solve the problems, and made it really clear that the best way to go would be to completely redo this one part.
Take this one stage further, taking solutions to your manager is worth 10x taking problems to this manager. For example I work with a codebase like this.
It is over ten years old, have multiple people working on it, many learning or of differing abilities. Frameworks have been used and over time their limitations come to light.
Often people have been band-aided something to save time, because they have been under severe time constraints. Large swathes of it are almost superseded but not quite.
The purpose of the software has subtly shifted over the last decade. So you're the new guy that's been assigned to this project Every software company has these projects and many developers have been in your position.
The fact a new resource you has been assigned suggests it's still a valuable project. Unless management are the ones giving the go-ahead on the rewrite then I wouldn't bother.
Rewrites are very risky, time-consuming and make no money for the company. However long you think it will take You're a mid-level developer, a rewrite needs to be planned and led by an experienced senior developer.
Your best bet might be patience In the meantime you get experience. It's how you handle the adversity that could prove more valuable.
It can also put you in an awkward position -- especially if the prior developer has a grudge against their code being rewritten -- as any bugs that come up can then be blamed on the rewrite effort, whether or not that was actually the cause.
Spaghetti code eventually collapses on its own, as every change starts taking longer and longer than expected, as well as introduces more and more bugs and fixes for those introduce more, and so on.
Once this starts happening, that can be the impetus to actually do a real rewrite effort, but one with a business case, management and hopefully the other developer s behind it.
Until then, a rewrite is a lot of effort that, at best, if you do a great job, is basically invisible beyond the code level , and at worst either becomes a scapegoat for or the cause of many other problems.
Agree with all of this. I don't work at a small company but refactoring and especially rewriting code is difficult and error prone.
It's a crazy thought but in many cases, it can be better to just leave the legacy code alone. It's all about ROI of your time and the opportunity cost of what you're working on.
If you're going to be making lots of changes to a specific part of the code base, then it very well may make sense to invest in improving it so r hat you can move faster after.
But if the code isnt going to be modified much, it may be better to just get in, make the changes you need, and get out.
As a mid level developer, nobody is expecting you to come in and rebuilt the thing immediately. Focus on learning it well first.
Rewrites are riskier when requirements need to be reverse engineered from the current solution, or if requirements are complex.
When requirements are simple, rewriting should be simple. This should at least give you the opportunity to contain technical debt to the most complex requirements.
To say "everything is complex therefore we cannot rewrite anything" is pretty implausible and mediocre. I disagree. Rewrites are risky because you're changing code that has been working for some time.
It is easy to introduce bugs into a sufficiently complex system when refactoring. Old code has been used. It has been tested.
You don't want to live in this hell during the rewrite, trust me! I doubt Joel Spolsky was equating legacy code with technical debt in this quote.
Not all technical debt is robust and well tested legacy code. Chromium for instance has code from the original KHTML written in the 90s, most of that remaining code is reasonable and makes sense today.
If it didn't someone would have replaced it. It is often true that someone with very strong domain knowledge may have had this project in their head for a long time, and one day, all-of-a-sudden, has to code it all in a rush.
I have had this, where external factors shifted the companies priorities. In this case you can 'brain dump' a lot of code very quickly, get it functionally correct and make intelligent judgement calls about the threats of edge cases However, coming at the problem from cold, without the benefit of this knowledge requires significant analysis and engineering effort to get equivalent results.
So tread very carefully. But yes, add tests. Somewhere by someone I read that a realistic estimate is your original estimate multiplied by 8.
This has proven to be more realistic than previous factors I've seen. Increase the time units by one and double it.
I am not familiar with this lingo. Why exactly is the OP a resource? Is this usage of "resource" common in business speak? Yes, developers are resources, what they produce needs to be of enough value to make up for the pay you supply them with.
The best developers write good clean code with low dependencies and tests for things that matter, most developers aren great developers though, and things can almost always be made better, even if they are.
Management discuss allocation of resources i. Assigning people to projects is done by the resource manager, a completly unrelated posistion.
I manage my team. When I discuss projects with my manager and the senior engineering leadership, they will almost always refer to staff as resources, e.
It's distasteful to me; I always refer to my team and other engineers as engineers or by name, not as "resources.
To balance things out, try casually slipping in the word "overhead" when talking about management. I do that. Does not harm.
They know themselves :. Good advice! By the 'resource manager'. Point stands. But, no place has HR assign resources. It is a term to enforce the concept of humans as commodity in a commercial environment by the overhead.
That's pretty normal in the industry. Had a client where the employees where stored in a table called "resources".
Also felt very much like a resource there.. It being called a resource is common in Big companies where they literally see you as a "resource".
This is worse when you are a 'resource' in a big service company. No it is not. That is just project management language. It is the culture of the company who makes the difference.
More precisely, your labor is the resource. Swap out the word "resource" with "asset" if that helps. They're synonyms in this context.
Unfortunately, yes. We are just replaceable cogs. I'm okay with this. They are paying me because the work isn't something that I'd do in my free time.
I'm okay knowing that others can do my job as well as I can. Its not art, it's a job. I'd rather be a replacable cog than a crucial lynchpin. I prefer to look at my job in the same way.
It's much less stressful that way. Are you familiar with the term "human resources"? What do you think HR is abbreviation for?
Here's a hard earned tip. The first few months, nobody's going to expect much from you anyway. Try to stretch the time you're 'getting up to speed with the code' as long as possible.
But in that time, write as many tests as possible. Don't tell anyone unless they ask; if there is no testing culture, they'll think you're just wasting your time on it.
Then at some point you will be expected to start delivering value. At that point, you can start making changes refactoring where necessary without fear.
This will let you grow your status in the organisation until you have a reputation of being the guy that can get things done and doesn't complain about how bad everything is and how everything is someone else's fault when he's assigned a task.
At that point, you can start making others write and maintain tests while you take control of keeping oversight of improving the code base quality.
Do not be tempted into 'rewrites' because you're setting yourself up for failure. It's a long play, yes. If you're feeling the way you describe just from the current state, you're probably not senior enough to do it.
It requires much more than just technical skills - those are abundant, it's not what you can build a career on. It's a bit Machiavellan, I guess, but in the end, everyone wins - but you need to have the Vision that others are not able to understand, so you have to find ways to make it happen anyway, in adversarial circumstances.
Good luck. If there's no testing culture it's pretty hard to introduce it into a team that doesn't have it either by choice or omission. It gets even worse if your teammates don't update tests thus break CI on code changes or just comment the tests out.
I've seen both happening way too often and would recommend getting at least some sort of team buy-in - as the alternative will surely burn you out sooner or later.
If you're the new hire and the first you you're doing is pester everyone with extra work they don't see the advantage of - that'll just get you the reputation of a know it all, in my experience.
That's why I suggested to start chipping at it on his own, so that he can show the value a few months down the line, rather than telling everyone how great it's going to be when he's not respected yet or hasn't proven himself yet.
But that's also what I meant by 'it's not a technical issue'. It's a matter of positioning himself as a reliable person whose opinion on technical matters needs to be considered.
New hires generally aren't, unless they have an impressive resume or reputation before they started at the company.
But someone like that doesn't ask this question to a bunch of strangers on the internet. Of course it depends on the circumstances.
If you're on your own trying to maintain a test suite on the code of 50 other people, none of whom work on these tests and think you're just trying to slow them down for no good reason, there's no way that will work.
But if there's only a few people working on the code and you can maintain tests for a more or less well defined part of it - it's possible if you're experienced enough; if you have to spend 2 weeks reading up on how to do unit testing, it's not a viable strategy of course.
I've actually seen it done within a large organization. It takes one boyscout who's respected and can clearly demonstrate the value provided by testing and designing for testability, and people will fall in line.
Nobody likes building on quicksand, so show them what concrete looks like. Damn that's motivating. I'll be quoting you on this one. If you have the choice, change teams or companies as soon as possible.
Life is too short to spend it paying off someone else's debt. If moving is not an option, then follow the parent's advice. Add all the missing tests as fast as you can.
Explain what you are doing to your manager. And set up CI to email your team whenever anyone checks in breaking changes.
This will motivate your teammate to start running your tests. If they are particularly narrow-minded, they will be unhappy about this. If this happens, reconsider your decision to stay.
Even after you write a lot of tests, coverage will be low. You will likely code some bugs that negatively impact the business.
I urge you to find a mentor inside the company, a senior engineer or engineering manager, and show them code and explain the technical debt to them.
Try not to blame your teammate for the situation, just explain to your mentor that you are concerned about introducing bugs.
Ask them to keep your discussion confidential. Your mentor can back you up when your bugs negatively impact the business. Climb up the dependencies tree and add tests there as well.
Don't fix things just for the sake of fixing them. Let new features, bugs, or necessary performance improvements drive your changes.
Keep your changes small and focused. You need to ensure that you're delivering business value with each change, rather than embarking on an overwhelming, open-ended task.
This is critical if you want the business to support your effort. It demonstrates pragmatism. It will shrink the scope of your changes and make the problem less daunting.
You can prove to your boss and your coworkers that it's possible to fix the problem without slowing down new development efforts.
Be careful how you express your dissatisfaction with the code. Many of the people who wrote it are likely still there. Approach every change from a positive angle, so you don't alienate your peers.
Get them to help you make the changes, and help them to learn how to become better developers. Don't assume they don't know better; they may have inherited a mess too, and they may have been under pressure to deliver quickly at any cost--or maybe they just don't know any better, but want to improve.
There are many others, but these three are particularly germane to your situation. I would agree. Your job is to implement the new features and leave the code in a better state than when you found it.
As a professional programmer, your job is not to produce beautiful code. Your job is to make money. There is a commercial decision for the organisation to make about paying back the tech debt in this code base.
That's not your decision to make. Likewise, it's not your decision to create more tech debt if you can avoid it sometimes you can't because deadlines are more important than tech debt.
As the parent said, your best course is to implement the new features, and refactor where it makes sense to do that to support the new features. But without any test suite, you risk breaking the existing features by doing anything more than the absolute minimum of refactoring.
That's bad. And welcome to the profession hehe. I don't agree with the first part. I have worked enough time on the management side to understand that management is always driven by business value it's their job.
So your point 'Let new [ But business value doesn't always mean that you need new features to justify working on a project.
Sometimes it is possible to justify working on something just by explaining technical debt and how much time it will cost in the future e.
Working in an unstable environment can drive you crazy as a developer and lower your productivity enormously. So if you don't talk about the issues in the code base with the management, they might wonder why you have lower output then others and classify you as a slow programmer.
Instead, I think you should bring the facts to the table slow down factor number of bugs, time to trace them down , risks likelihood of production issues , in terms of how much time it costs to work within the current code base and let the management decide on how to proceed make sure to bring a recommendation.
If they are willing to let you spend time on improving the quality, try to modularize it so that if the rewrite will be stopped at any time, the time you spend refactoring it helps you in the future.
The management basically has these options: 1. If the management decides to continue with option one or two, do the best you can under the circumstances be pragmatic as caymanjim wrote.
Make sure to include option four so that the management sees the full spectrum of options at hand. I came to recommend Feathers' book. Those strategies will save your bacon when you go to solve these problems.
I put it in the "must read" list for all mid-level engineers. To be fair, I put all three of those in my must read category. Bookmark this page so that 15 years down the line in your career you can reflect on it.
You will have delivered a working software product against all odds, under impossible budget and time demands. Finally they let you hire some help and instead of getting busy helping writing tests and refactoring he starts thinking about the best way to throw you under the bus to your superiors.
By that point in a project's lifecycle, that's not what they usually ask of the new hires. Both of which are extremely challenging and stressful when working on a project that comes with no tests, or documentation.
Your actual task as the new hire is to start generating more value for the company, but that's so much more challenging when you have no way of validating your solutions, no infrastructure to rely on, and no metrics or documentation to consult.
At that point, being the new hire, you're taking a lot of heat for not getting things done on time - mostly through no fault of your own.
At that point, "wanting to throw you under the bus to your superiors" is a very natural response - it's a defense mechanism, you're rightfully frustrated.
You're between a rock and a hard place. Can you not relate to that? This should be the top comment.
At my company it is amazing how clueless young graduates play politics from day one, while doing no real work other than going from conference to conference and self-promoting on Twitter.
Start writing tests, change no production code. There are times when things that appear to be bugs are actually weird features that the business needs to function.
Sometimes cruft is actually a bug fix. Start with high level integration tests of the most critical business processes. I once did a major cleanup at the start of my career.
In our case, I think we didn't write a lot of tests, because we didn't know they're so useful then. But much later I did a few ports of FOSS software between programming languages, and comprehensive test suites were absolutely godsend in those cases.
So, if you can, try to write tests as first thing indeed. Other than that, we took a kind of "organism fighting a cancer" approach.
In a spaghetti codebase, we tried to find some smallest possible islands of the most isolated code a lot of detectivistic work.
Then try to improve the isolation even more — slowly engulfing the "tumor" in a more reasonable API. Once we had a somewhat acceptable API, with mostly well understood semantics, rewrite the internals of the tumor from scratch.
Rinse and repeat. Notably, as mentioned by JohnBooty, we did talk this with management. The argument was that there was a particular critical bug, which would result in lost consumer data.
This one bug was found very close to original release date, and opened our eyes to the horrors in the codebase actually, a big part written by a subcontractor.
Sorry if the reply is somewhat chaotic, I didn't have much time to write it. Are all errors being logged, with stack traces? Next, the deployment process.
Are tests run on all deploys? Are there canary deploys to minimize impact when bad code goes out? Easy rollbacks?
Can you run it easily locally? Can you easily attach a debugger? After that, add end-to-end, integration, then unit tests, in that order.
Only then, once you understand the code well, and have it nicely instrumented and tested, should you consider significant refactors. If any of the above steps are already well covered, skip them.
Tests should catch most errors, monitoring should quickly catch the rest to minimize the impact. I think you are right, though in my experience in these situations is that defining the exact behavior is very hard.
In not many cases was the messy code written messy from the start, it's usually an accumulation of changes to behavior - which are very hard to figure out.
Either that or you split them up yourself and risk breaking something. These tests may be brittle and they may not cover all branches.
This is what i would suggest as well. I did some "rewrites" in my carreer and they only really went well when i worked long enough with the legacy code before.
If you feel the code is messy it is likely you are missing some essential business logic as well when blindly rebuilding it. Feathers which I heartily recommend.
I got it a while back when working on a similar sounding codebase and it was very useful. Yes, so good.
Martin Fowler's Refactoring is an excellent companion to Feathers' book. It will be worthwhile to know that a second edition of that book is expected to come out shortly.
Is there a chapter on what to do if your coworkers don't initialize variables? I just inherited a steaming pile of legacy where they didn't and I'm struggling to understand how they got it to run at all.
At least I'm starting to understand why we held off on the spectre patches. Not explicitly, no, but it does have some techniques for reading code that might help?
Do you mean global variables? I guess it entirely depends on what language and framework you're using, but trying to refactor things to have less global state is generally for the best.
ISL on Aug 22, This book was written for OP and many others. It specifically addresses the "there are no tests, what do I do? Is it buggy?
Is it insecure? Is it slow? If the answers to those questions are no. Then you the problem and you should look for employment elsewhere. You are unhappy in that job, and you rewriting the codebase would potentially make the above questions answer to a YES, inflicting damages in the company.
Now, if the above questions have yes as an answer. Talk to your manager, explain how it won't scale, how it is hackable, and the bugs you found - and get the blessing to make things better!
If you ask me, this is a pretty awful approach. Some codebases are so obscenely dangerous that you really shouldn't be giving a shit whether or not it "works", because it's only a matter of time before it doesn't.
There are code practices that are inexcusable under any circumstance. Sitting on a fucking nailbomb when it's in your power to change it because you don't want the headache of having to push for a real solution will catch up with you in the end.
I'm not saying that you have an option in a do-or-die situation where it needs to be done in a couple days. I'm also not saying that you should subvert or defy management to execute a massive overhaul or total rewrite.
I am saying that if you understand a system, know that it's fundamentally flawed, and have a window to fix it even if it's a really tiny one , but choose not to, you are part of the problem.
The standards that software developers are held to in terms of quality are an absolute joke, and the "it hasn't completely imploded our business operation, so don't even think about fixing it" mentality is where those standards stem from.
This seems like a great post to vent a little bit. I'm definitely a bit touchy on this subject. I like to think I'm pretty good at programming, development, and generally architecting solutions.
I don't have a lot of experience, but I have a bit of talent and spent a lot of free time learning. Solving problems with computers is something I'm passionate about.
I started this particular project without any idea of what it was okay, they told me what it was, but it turned out to be something completely different.
When we did a kickoff it was myself, two other developers who both said during the kickoff they didn't want to be on this team, and wanted to go back to admin'ing MSSQL databases , and a non-technical TPM last time he touched a terminal was a decade ago, and he wasn't particularly interested even back then.
I ended up doing pretty much all the work. The first few weeks they wanted three services stood up and managed in an automated fashion. I got it done, it wasn't pretty.
Hell I hadn't even figured out a DNS scheme, but this had to get done so other teams would be unblocked; it was the development account so I wasn't too worried about rushed work.
Then we got more requests from other teams, and vague requirements from the infosec and governance teams. Then the board that reviews new technologies shot down our my requests to introduce automation services like Ansible Tower.
Then the AWS team shot down our request for multiple accounts, one per environment. At this point the Cloudformation isn't scaling, I beg and plead for some time to freeze feature development and move to Terraform.
I asked for weeks, and was given 4 days. This was the one chance to move to Terraform though, otherwise we'd be using Cloudformation for the foreseeable future.
So I took it, deciding I could rush through the Terraform rewrite, because then at least we could refactor it later during downtime.
Next thing you know a year has gone by and we're going into production. Everything on the devops end goes pretty smoothly.
My velocity is crap though, due in large part because of the shitty rushed work, which it seemed was all I was capable of. A few months after go-live, we finally get a real TPM, which was a godsend.
I was moving to another team at this point, and so his first order of business was to replace me with two new guys.
I spent a lot of nights interviewing and a month afterwards helping them get up to speed. I and the new TPM gave them cover that month so they could embark on rewriting the Terraform.
They ignored my suggestions on how to refactor it, which is okay, I was leaving the team, it was their code as now. But it was hard, hearing them laugh at the code behind my back, saying how bad it was.
Never giving me a chance to justify it, or even reading the commit messages, to understand why it was done that way.
I'm off the team now, and while I recognize I left a lot of legacy code behind which I'm not proud of , it wasn't just me who created it.
It was also the business who said time and again development speed was the most important thing. That's how one legacy codebase was created.
There were a lot of things I might have been able to do differently mostly politically , but I truly believe I did the best I could with what I had.
But what do I know? My new TPM seemed to agree with me, but maybe he just didn't want to make an enemy. Perhaps I could have headed it off if I'd said the right words to the right people.
I don't know, will never know. This experience is why I don't make fun of others solutions. Somebody put effort and time and thought into it, and I guarantee in most cases I don't have that context to properly evaluate it.
I feel like this is how most legacy code bases are made. This is a surefire way to re-introduce bugs that were fixed ages ago.
Understanding why things are the way they are is the first order of business when working within a legacy code base. Was it done this way because the obvious way has a non-obvious edge case?
Was it a requirement from the users? Or was it just the fastest way to do it at the time? You have to have a certain mindset to effectively work on legacy code, and this isn't it.
Most more junior developers I've known have a "rewrite" oriented mindset, meaning they don't know how to work within the constraints of what exists and refactor piecemeal.
It's a hard to learn skill, generally learnt the hard way. Thanks for sharing this. Venting is good, and in this case a win-win, since this is good info very relevant in a thread about encountering "bad codebases".
Hopefully OP sees it. You could well be "the other developer" where OP is. Open question: how does one fight against what's been described in this comment?
What specific sorts of communication skills? One thing that comes to mind is learning when and how hard to push-back, and how to argue with force when necessary.
The reason I ask such a specific question is because I'm not great at confrontations. I don't dread locking horns, but I'm not good at it.
Diplomacy seems to me to equate to "die a bit more inside, burn some more of your own wick to deal with the frustration, don't say anything, and wait and see how things work out".
So I end up not engaging at all. I know I'm missing something huge here and I don't know what it is.
Right, duly noted. I'm actually speaking completely generally though; I'm falling apart at this universally speaking. Perhaps I just need to learn how to debate?
Things rapidly go south from there; the biggest side-effect is that my memory completely shuts down, meaning that I cannot remember a any of the things the other person said so I cannot form an effective defense , b any of the things I said so if I say something incorrect[ly] I won't remember and c the way I say what I say, which means that my tone of voice might be off and I'll basically be too spaced-out to notice.
The resulting arguments are almost comical in their narrow-focusedness, with the resulting back-and-forth many many degrees away from whatever the original point was which typically gets lost within the first few seconds of conversation.
This is probably due to autism and some related undiagnosed anxiety disorder, but labels aside I've never really known where to start tackling something like this.
I've given up on mental health support, which only has its own agenda I don't want the brain-fog of drugs, so all the departments could care less , I just want to brain-hack my thinking onto the right track and I've no idea how.
FWIW, this is one of the reasons I'm actually reluctant to get a job, so I'm yet to get practical experience dealing with real-world issues.
UpgradeCarton on Aug 24, Sometimes the act of writing the notes helps your recall later. If you feel that you still can't recall your notes from memory, then refer to your notes and ask to delay any debate about the topic until you have them in front of you.
Your recall may improve if you hand write your notes versus typing them out. This would be worth its own Ask HN, if it hasn't been posted before.
TheJoYo on Aug 23, Given the context, I think the individual that you're quoting said that because they did do that within the commit messages.
And outside of the one place where I was the person to introduce source control to the organization, I've found commit messages to be pretty telling.
Most developers tend to let their feelings pop out in their commit messages, and too when and how often they're committing.
In your particular case, sounds like either a junior developer, legacy systems, or a sole developer. You have identified 3 important non-functional requirements: robustness, security and performance.
Consider you have 2 cars: both are reliable, but during maintenance one of them requires you to buy rare and expensive replacement parts that you need to import yourself, only one shop in the entire city can work with it and it takes 2 weeks to get the work done.
Which car would you rather have after going the process I described 3 times? A software project can be fast, reliable, and secure while also being extremely poorly engineered and extremely difficult to maintain and extend.
Not a large one. Somebody fathered a legacy codebase. JamesBarney on Aug 22, Only successful applications have the pleasure of getting old.
Retra on Aug 22, I'm not sure about "any" measure, the average startup probably has no surviving code in production.. Even the average in acquired startups, if we count acquihires..
Success, in this context, means having solved some problem for a meaningful length of time. Retra on Aug 24, That doesn't exclude anything. Code can exist to pad resumes, feed paranoia, and bolster egos, manipulate people, or simply because someone can't admit their own mistakes.
Anything can be a solution to a problem. Yes, those things do happen. However, that isn't what I meant by the word "problem". I was talking about end-user problems.
DoreenMichele on Aug 22, So you're saying they speak from experience and know whereof they speak.
Why can't you badmouth the previous developer? Sometimes they were simply shit developers and wrote large quantities of shit code.
Circumstances be damned, I've seen a few developers that should outright find a new career. Generally because once you start badmouthing a person, it quickly gets into politics rather than being a technical discussion about the problems you're trying to solve.
And with politics it's generally less about what you know than who you know, so the person who's had a chance to build connections in the company will probably come out on top.
Varcht on Aug 22, Hard to guess their motives but it is easy to click on their username and see that they post a lot from it.
Stop "repairing" it because you're guaranteed to introduce bugs and regressions. You haven't learned it well enough and can already sense the fragility, which is why you're anxious.
Relate your impressions to the person in charge: "The code doesn't seem to follow best practice and appears fragile.
You think there may be technical debt that needs to be addressed sooner than later. Until you're confident enough that you can pitch a comprehensive redesign and rewrite, wait for the person in charge to direct you towards specific repairs.
When they direct you towards these specific repairs, they will anticipate regressions and instability. They'll see you as working through issues, not causing them.
Repeat step 2 periodically and with greater detail until you're ready to make the pitch in Step 3. Don't rush it. The alternate solution: leave and let somebody else deal with the problem.
Some people are comfortable working around fragile and wonky code; some people get really stressed out. You don't need to work in a job that's going to perpetually stress you out.
For me it is more rewarding than working with pristine and well managed code bases. I was explaining greenfield vs. Keeping in mind the above, I also know that deadlines, changing requirements, and lack of a clear goal due to the previously mentioned items , lead to this.
Had I not worked with them, my decade and a half of experience would have strongly suggested that such was the case. When it comes down to it, some people prefer working on new projects, and some people prefer supporting and polishing those once-new projects.
But to really succeed you've got to be able to do both, to some extent. I love your answer because it calls out the perception of what you're doing.
It's so important to frame what you're doing in a positive light, otherwise you'll fail, whether or not you make the codebase better.
Every programmer that has ever existed has said and felt this exact thing. It used to really bother me as well. Then I realized that the world is a messy place and I would need a stronger stomach if I was going to watch the sausage being made.
Don't refactor because it violates your delicate sensibilities about code - that's a great way to waste a lot of money and get yourself fired.
Greenfield development or maintaining a legacy code base that isn't complete shit is a luxury.
Only tens of thousands of LOC? I've worked in places with millions of lines of spaghetti code. The reality is that most business software that's been around for a while looks like this.
If the environment itself is good, and you like the people you work with, then you should see it for the great opportunity that it is; learn how to slowly evolve a large software project for the better.
There's none of the stress of trying to figure out the "right" architecture, no worrying about making bad decisions. You can just chip away tidying things up.
Things that are probably a bad idea: Trying to rewrite will almost certainly fail , Blaming others it's no one's fault, it just is what it is , Walking away negative signal for future employers.
You'll learn what all the code does, you'll learn a new skill, you'll have a safety net of regression tests for rewriting the code, and you'll be adding value to the company.
If you have good test coverage, you'll be able to rewrite the code very quickly. There are a ton of resources for how and why to do testing.
One that stands out in my mind is SQLite. They've talked about being able to refactor the core of their engine in a weekend, only because they had the test coverage to know they did it right.
Start there. That book changed my career. All the stuff is gold. It applies to every language, every work environment and every client I've ever been at.
This is the 1 book I have my teams read. I am a senior dev managing a large and relatively messy codebase.
This means that the person in charge of the code is probably aware of its shortcomings. Your senior is probably very happy to have another dev helping with this.
I wish I had someone helping me. Take it as an opportunity, dealing with legacy is a challenge but you can grow a lot as a developer!
BaronVonSteuben on Aug 23, I agree, but it's fraught with risk, and could also turn into an opportunity to spend several months or even years being miserable, and thought a mediocre to poor developer because you aren't able to deliver fast enough.
This becomes especially true when the original developer is there and can probably do things 10x faster which will make you look bad.
Perception is more important than anything. If you save the world but do it quietly, nobody will know, and they'll decide you aren't productive enough.
I agree, I think OP should find a way to present his work as a "project" that makes sense to management A good example, someone else in this comments thread suggested that OP could create an API around the legacy core.
Creating an API is something that can be "sold" well to management. Do it. Slice and dice. Embrace the shitiness.
Accept it. Own it. It's your playground. Sharpen your skills, and lead them to the promised land. It could be worse.
You could face major resistance and people issues. Appreciate it. This is an opportunity for you to kick a billion miles of ass I'd start with writing tests.
That way you're more likely to notice if you break something in a distant part of the code. Also see if you can make a to-do list.
This will help make your request concrete to management. As you cross items off it will help them see that you're actually getting work done.
And, it could help to motivate you if you feel like you're "just rewriting the code". This is the reality, don't expect every code base is clean and well organized.
I have come across the same situation for a couple of times in my career. I felt disappointed at the beginning, I wondered how high-paid engineers could write such shitty code, but quickly I found it's actually a very challenging job.
To understand the code base was like playing puzzle games with debugging tools. I had invented tools with some new stuff I just learnt to trace and visualized the program, or wrote scripts to clean up the code.
Eventually I became the owner of these projects, and refactor the hell out of it. Nun ist aber alles wirklich gut.
So auch in diesen Tagen. Und schon passierte mir nach 14 Jahren etwas, was ich nie für möglich gehalten hätte. Sehen Sie nicht, dass ich körperbehindert bin?
Musste das sein? Worüber haben Sie sich geärgert, worüber b gefreut? Wir wollen das jetzt wissen. Gehen Sie online auf www. Jetzt nur noch anmelden und Text und Foto eingeben.
Eine Bitte: Es können nur Texte veröffentlicht werden, die per Mail eingeschickt werden. Das Beste daran ist, dass es für einen von der Redaktion ausgewählten Artikel 50 Euro gibt!
Achtung: Berichte mit persönlichen Beleidigungen, Angriffen oder Falschdarstellungen sowie Werbetexte für eigene Produkte werden nicht veröffentlicht.
Im Rahmen dieser Vortragsreihe findet am Mittwoch, den Oktober, ein Reisevortrag über Albanien statt. Beginn ist um 15 Uhr im Gemeindesaal der St.
Lorenz Gemeinde, Steinrader Weg Herr E. Milbrod wird über seine Reise mit dem Motorrad nach Albanien berichten. Dornröschen Lübeck.
Für die jüngsten Theaterbesucher gibt es im Theater am Tremser Teich wieder einmal einen richtigen Märchenklassiker zu erleben.
WeitereVorstellungen finden bis zum November immer samstags und sonntags um 16 Uhr statt. Alle Infos und Tickets gibt es unter www.
Der Informationsabend findet am Die ersten bekannten Aufzeichnungen in der Familientradition des Natursteinwerk Rechtglaub-Wolf liegen fast Jahre zurück.
In einer Steinmetzwerkstatt in der Lübecker Innenstadt am Binnenhafen wurden die ersten Natursteine, vorwiegend aus den skandinavischen Ländern, zu Grabsteinen verarbeitet.
Mittlerweile führt Stefan Wolf in vierter Generation das Unternehmen. Zusammen mit etwa 30 Beschäftigten und Lehrlingen hat sich das Natursteinwerk auf den Innenausbau bei Privatpersonen spezialisiert.
Steinmetzmeister Stefan Wolf fertigt in seinem modernen Werk und vor Ort alles, was die Kunden wünschen. Immer noch wird traditionell Granit verarbeitet.
Jährlich werden mehr als 3. In dem Hauptsitz des Unternehmens in. In einer europaweiten Ausschreibung werden Investoren für das insgesamt In einem ersten Bauabschnitt sollen Wohnungen, Büros und Gastronomie auf einem Etwa Wohnungen im oberen Preissegment sind angedacht.
Auch ein Hotel an der Spitze der Wallhalbinsel, wo sich jetzt der Strandsalon befindet, wird in Erwägung gezogen. Wir denken, r.
Kohlrabi ohl hlra h lra ab bii rrot ot ot aus sN No Norddeutschland ord rdde de eut u sc schl hlan and sse I Klasse ck Stück. Milka Tafelschokolade verschiedene ve errs sc ch hie ed de ene ne S Sorten orte or en Tafel g Ta 10 afel fe el.
Abgabe nur in haushaltsüblichen Mengen. Die Zuschriften geben die Meinung der Leser wieder. Die Redaktion behält sich Auswahl und Kürzungen vor.
Wir möchten darauf hinweisenn, enor n können, haben den gleichen TTenor. Auf dieser Seite geben wir einige Leserreaktionen auf die Titelgeschichte abdrucke ausgewählt werden.
Meinung mit sich deshalb um keine repräsentative Einsendungen, die wir erhalten haben und aus Platzgründen leider nicht m.
Wir haben hier in Bad Schwartau gerade einen regionalen Konfirmandentag gehabt, an dem wir ca. Denn die gedachte und gelebte Nächstenliebe kann nicht nur ein Schatz für den Hilfsbedürftigen sein, sondern auch für den Helfer und den Frieden in dieser Welt.
Agathe C. Hier urteilen Menschen über Menschen ohne, dass einer den anderen zu Gesicht bekommen oder kennengelernt hat, geschweige denn mit ihnen gewohnt hat.
Ich stelle mir gerade vor einer dieser asylsuchenden Menschen zu sein. Ich stelle mir gerade vor, suchtkrank zu sein.
Sie bekommen das Gefühl, alles andere als erwünscht zu sein oder zumindest geduldet zu werden. Ich bitte alle, die sich ein Vorurteil erlaubt haben, mal in sich zu gehen und nachzuspüren, wie sie sich fühlen würden mit dieser ablehnenden Haltung, nachdem sie im eigenen Land verfolgt und verletzt wurden.
Hatten wir das nicht alles schon einmal in ähnlicher Weise vor 70 Jahren? Jörg H. Sie schüren die Angst , dass durch weitere Asylanten das Leben in Moisling noch schlechter wird.
Die sich rücksichtslos gegenüber ihren Nachbarn verhalten, ständig vor den Supermärkten Penny, Sky und Kiosken BrüderGrimm-Ring und in den angrenzenden Parkanlagen herumlungern und damit einen schlechtes Vorbild für die Kinder sind.
Durch das meist nächtliche Treiben werden die arbeitenden und älteren Mitbewohner um ihren Schlaf gebracht. Die von Ihnen interviewten Moislinger vertreten eine nicht repräsentative Meinung über Asylanten.
Nur seiner Klassenkameradin Karen Lily Collins kann er jetzt noch trauen. Doch auch andere Gegner setzen sich auf seine Spur, um genau das zu verhindern.
In jeder Zeile, in jeder Spalte und in jedem der 9erBlocks aus 3x3 Kästchen darf jede Zahl nur einmal vorkommen. Das T-Shirt mit dem Ketchupfleck.
Das markante Kinn. Kein Zweifel, dieser Junge ist er! Doch wenn Nathan gar nicht bei seinen richtigen Eltern lebt, wer ist er wirklich? Schlagartig wird ihm klar, dass sein ganzes Leben eine Lüge sein muss.
Als Nathan beginnt, nach seiner wahren Identität zu forschen, wird er plötzlich zur Zielscheibe hochpro-. Das ist los Groove shit, Baby!
Oktober, alle Schüler, Stuudenten und Junggebliebenen en zum Feiern ein. Die Stimmungskanone Axel Martinsteg sorgt in Hawaiihemd für gute Laune und auf alle offenen Schankmixgetränke und Flaschenbiere gibt es einen extra guten Preis an diesem Abend.
Am Freitag, Melodie meets groove! Nichts für Dich dabei? Dann schreib einfach eine Email an bsh samstag-aktuell.
Norderstedt, bl. Anlässlich des Die CD ist im Handel erhältlich oder auf www. Die Sensation ist perfekt!
Sie stehen zum ersten Mal und exklusiv mit einer Band gemeinsam auf der Bühne. Am Oktober gastieren sie dabei auch im Werkhof in Lübeck. Beginn ist um 20 Uhr.
Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr, Änderungen vorbehalten. Fotos: Veranstalter, hfr, bilderbox. Herrensmoking, Oberhemden, Marke Henry Morell.
Hosen ab Gr. Zubehör 1 Samstag Aktuell: Auflage Immobilien- u. Vermietungsanzeigen werden generell als gewerblich berechnet. Ausnahmen sind private Anzeigen, in denen von Privatpersonen Häuser verkauft, Mietwohnungen oder Nachmieter gesucht werden.
Text nur in Druckbuchstaben ausfüllen. Wort- und Satzzeichen zählen als ein Anschlag. Hinter jedem Wort oder Satzzeichen muss ein Kästchen frei bleiben.
Holzstühle, 2 Beistelltische u. Technisch tip top! Scenic für 12 Pers. Für Hörfehler, die bei der telefon.
Aufgabe von Annoncen entstehen, übernimmt der Verlag keine Haftung. In jedem Fall ist der Auftraggeber zur Zahlung der Annoncenrechnung verpflichtet.
Kinder Holzkletterturm druckimpräg. CD-Brenner, ehrl. Treffen, Unterhaltung u. Mann 35 J. Komme aus Norderstedt.
Wer teilt mit mir 54, 1. LCD Sportuhr m. Stoppuhr, Alarm, wasserdicht, sportl. De1 sign, Digit. Kunstkarttons, 50 Shar-Pei-Welpen, Faltenhun- x.
Ingo Heidborn, 1 de geimpft, m. Wir, 5 Jungs u. Bei Interesse unter 1 melden oder Brutei online. Dunkelbraune Bruteier von Marans schwarz kupfern.
Bei Interesse unter: 1 melden oder Brutei onlne. Alte Bierflaschen mit erhabener Schrift von Sammler gesucht. Duoprop, neuwertig, elektr.
Werftbau, satz, 5x3m, noch originalvers. Gebot gniert m. Aufbauanleitung umstd. Kein finanzielles In- Dachstein zu verschenken. Bis ca.
Ihres Hundes. Sachkun denachweis u. Preis mind. Glutenfrei, Lactosefrei, ohne Gentechnik hergestellt. John F. Winterlandschaft, Rummelplatz, Riesenrad, Gruselhaus u.
Sammler u. Top Service. Druck und Layout zum Discountpreis. Verteilung Stk. Zapfenschlagen etc. Samstag, 8. Schreibmaschine, Preis VHB, div. Silberankauf Mercedes sic, Bj.
Personalwesen, Kundiv. Luebeck 1 Druckfehler vorbehalten. Aktionspreise sind zeitlich begrenzt. Verkauf nur solange der Vorrat reicht.
Oetker Die Ofenfrische oder Culinaria Pizza versch. Coca-Cola versch. Sorten, teilw. Bin 60 fit diskret 1 Zimmermann und Allroundhandwerker erledigt alle anfallenden Arbeiben in und am Haus f.
KG www. Bewerben Sie sich online oder telefonisch unter:. Ab dem Der Erlös wird in den Aufbau einer Bildungseinrichtung investiert. Sie vert teilen in verteilen einem kleinen Team T Zeitungen und Beilage en.
Sie nehmen Anzeigen an, beraten gegebenenfalls unsere Kunden und erledigen allgemeine Bürotätigkeiten. Wir bieten eine interessante Tätigkeit in einem tollen Team bei einem tollen Blatt!
Herrn Peter J. Ihre Aufgabe ist es, unser Lager und unsere Austräger zu betreuen, sowie Reklamanten vor Ort zu bearbeiten.
Bachelor-Absolventen in Lübeck verabschiedet Lübeck. In den vergangenen Semestern absolvierten sie neben ihrem Studium der Betriebswirtschaftslehre mit den Schwerpunkten Tourismus, Industrie oder Dienstleistungen zusätzlich eine Ausbildung in einem Unternehmen.
Zusammen mit den Absolventen der Berufsakademie aus Kiel und Flensburg haben insgesamt Nachwuchsführungskräfte in diesem Jahr ihr duales Studium an der Wirtschaftsakademie erfolgreich abgeschlossen.
Erfolgreiche Betriebswirte: Christoph Lorenzen 2. Reihe mit seinen Mitabsolventen und Dozenten. In den vergangenen zwei Jahren stand für sie während ihrer Weiterbildung betriebswirtschaftliches Know-how in allen Formen auf dem Programm.
Jahrgangsbester wurde Christoph Lorenzen aus Lübeck, der. Der Fachkräftebedarf in der Wirtschaft steigt.
Junge Berufseinsteiger haben gute Chancen, ihren Traumjob zu finden — Voraussetzung sind gute Noten in der Abschlussprüfung.
Petri Kirche. Sohn GmbH. Vielleicht gab es auf deinem Lebensweg schon so manches Hindernis. Für deinen Berufsstart kannst du auf unsere Unterstützung zählen.
Im Gleichschritt damit könnte sich auch die Zahl der an Demenz erkrankten Menschen bis zum Jahr auf etwa 2,2 Millionen verdoppeln.
Das Alter ist der Hauptrisikofaktor für eine solche Erkrankung. Durch immer wieder neue Eindrücke und Erfahrungen werde die Synapsenbildung gefördert, Routine sei dagegen Gift.
Deshalb lauetet die Empfehlung von Fachleuten, das Gehirn zu trainieren und neugierig zu bleiben - etwa mit Sudoku, Rätseln oder Gedächtnistrainingskursen.
Aus frischen Zutaten, abwechslungsreich und gesund. Mal probieren? Unser Angebot an Neukunden, eine komplette Woche für nur.
Oktober Oktober. Sie ie laden Filme, Musik und anderer Programme herunter ter und nutzen soziale Netzwerke.
Doch trotz aller Warnungen und vermeintlicher Vorsicht werden sie auch ch Opfer von Abzockern und Betrügern. Das Frühstück beginnt um Oktober erfolgen.
Die heutige Welt ist schnelllebig. Terminstress, multimediale Informationsflut und ständige Neuerungen bestimmen den Alltag. Auch im Privatleben sorgt ein wachsendes Freizeitangebot oft zusätzlich für Trubel.
Dabei sind gerade diese entspannten Phasen so wichtig - einmal, um leistungsfähig zu bleiben, aber auch für eine gesunde Psyche.
Entspannen im Heim-Spa Jeder sollte sich darum zwischendurch einfach mal zurückziehen, eine kleine Auszeit nehmen und sich nach Herzenslust verwöhnen.
Dazu muss man nicht gleich ein kostspieliges Wochenende im Wellnesshotel buchen. Auch die. Wenn sich die feinen Puderkristalle im einlaufenden Wasser lösen, entsteht ein blumig-fruchtiger Duft nach Malve und Cassis.
Diese Aromen wecken Erinnerungen an den Sommer und geben. Wir lassen Sie nicht allein. Die Angehörigengruppe trifft sich jeden 1.
Mittwoch im Monat von Erstes Treffen Mittwoch, 5. Auch danach ist es jederzeit möglich, an der Gruppe teilzunehmen.
Auch die leuchtend lila Farbe, die das Wasser durch das Sinnensalz erhält, wirkt aktivierend. Etwas sanfte Musik dazu vertreibt noch die letzten schweren Gedanken und der Glücksgenuss ist rundum perfekt.
Der Sommer zeigt sich noch auf unserer Haut und wir freuen uns auf gemütliche Tage, kuschelige Stunden und glamouröse Feste. Trockene Luft und Temperaturwechsel machen der Haut in der kalten Jahreszeit besonders zu schaffen.
Um den Elan des Sommers zu bewahren, benötigt die Haut jetzt eine besonders intensive Pflege. Für einen strahlenden Teint und ein sanftes Hautgefühl lohnt es, sich hin und wieder eine erfrischende Maske zu gönnen.
Mit pflanzlichen Inhaltsstoffen angereichert, kann sie die Hautstruktur sichtbar verfeinern und die Hautelastizität spürbar verbessern.
Auch die empfindliche Augenpartie braucht besondere Aufmerksamkeit: Um dunkle Augenringe zu vertreiben oder feine Linien und Fältchen unter den Augen zu verringern, hat gibt es spezielle Eye Revitaliser und Augencremes, die für ein entspanntes Aussehen wie nach einem Wohlfühl-Urlaub sorgen.
Lady Vital: Alle Neumitglieder, die bis zum Oktober kommen, trainieren bis Ende des Jahres kostenlos und zahlen zudem keine Aufnahmegebühr.
Wenn Sie Ihr Gewicht deutlich reduzieren und auch halten möchten, dann kommen Sie zu uns. Wer bis zum Ganz ohne Chemie und Nebenwirkungen.
Toto Expertentipp VideoWIESENHOF: Werder-Expertentipp 27. Spieltag 19/20 Neben dem Spielerschutz beinhaltet die Kundenkarte einen weiteren entscheidenden Vorteil. Gewusst wie: über Die 4 Torwette Gewinnränge 1. Weitere Infos zur Kundenkarte Bereits vor dem Wochenende findet die Ersatzauslosung für jedes Beste Spielothek in Gohla finden Spiel statt. Suche starten. Diese stehen Ihnen ebenfalls als pdf-Format zum Download zur Verfügung. Rang: 5er Bonus 5 Fixspiele richtig Der 5. Rang: 5 Richtige 2. Rang: 4 Richtige Pirates Of Fortune. Achtung, Systembetrug! Fällt ein Spiel aus oder wird abgebrochen oder verschoben, so dass es nicht gewertet werden kann, wird für das betroffene Spiel auf die Ersatzauslosung zurückgegriffen. Dahinter ist eine Tendenz aufgeführt, die aus drei Ziffern besteht. Wir meinen aber, dass vor allem die Vielzahl an mittleren Gewinnen Spiele Golden Myth - Video Slots Online Beweis für die Qualität unserer Konstruktionen ist. Preis incl Ust. Sind Sie bereits Kunde? Die 5 Toto Gewinnränge 1. Die 5 Fixspiele müssen getippt werden, aus den 13 Wahlspielen wählen Sie die 8 Spiele aus, die Wettscheine FГјr Heute tippen möchten.
RED BULL FIRMENSITZ Toto Expertentipp Risiko Casino kГnnen Sie fГr Spieler aus Deutschland, Toto Expertentipp freigebigen 100 Geldbonus.
|WAS IST SCAMMING CS GO||Anhand zahlreicher Beispiele wird aufgezeigt, wie man diese Systeme taktisch klug Beste Spielothek in GroГџ Buchholz finden und den Rücklauf steigern kann. In der Regel stellt die erstgenannte Mannschaft die Heimmannschaft dar. Die 5 Toto Gewinnränge 1. Sind Sie bereits Kunde?|
|Toto Expertentipp||Schnell Lernen Synonym|
|RUГЏLAND VS URUGUAY||Beste Spielothek in LГјГџmitz finden|
|Lena Ruppert||Dabei gilt: Heimsieg — Unentschieden — Gastsieg. Rang: 4 Richtige 3. Jetzt auf win2day. Was ist der Toto TeamTipp? Neben dem Spielerschutz beinhaltet die Kundenkarte einen weiteren entscheidenden Vorteil. Die besten Garantiekürzungen aller Zeiten - ausgearbeitet von internationalen Mathematikern. Beste Spielothek in MГ¶hren finden 2 : Die Auswärtsmannschaft Austria Wien gewinnt.|
|Toto Expertentipp||Eines der besten Profisysteme überhaupt: Sicherer 1. Toto können Sie mit Wettschein in Ihrer Annahmestelle oder über win2day. Tipp X : Das Spiel endet unentschieden. Anders als beim Anonymspiel können alle Gewinne dem Spielteilnehmer zugeordnet werden und werden automatisch überwiesen. Hier Zoo Spiele Online der 2. Was ist der Toto TeamTipp?|